• maness300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s a drop in the ocean compared to how much energy the banking industry uses.

    • UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Watch out! Lemmy is full of Fudd that are not part of the cult. You need actual data to convince them and not even just the comparison of 2 numbers but something that takes into account the comparative size of both industries.

      Don’t worry, you will be able to laugh at them after your gambling addiction pays up.

      (Jk you might not even be a line goes up guy but you do seem to have a lot of the crypto bible memorized)

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          yup, tho they also serve more people than crypto bros, about 100,000 times as many

        • clgoh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Including everything, about a million times less energy per transaction than crypto.

      • Dra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think this is the most forced ‘lmao’ I have ever read

    • clgoh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      The banking industry uses at least 50x more, right?

      • Snekeyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lets talk about the bank branchs, data centers, and energy consumption vs crypto.

        "Research has found that bitcoin miners alone consume approximately between 60 to 125 TWh of energy annually, which is equivalent to around 0.6% of global electricity

        “Traditional banks’ total annual energy consumption of traditional banks is around 26 TWh on running servers, 26 TWh on ATMs, and 87 TWh from an estimate of 600k+ branches worldwide. Totaling 139 TWh.”

        Not to mention banks impact on people’s lives. Limited purchasing power of the poor and soon to join them middle class… to purchase disposable products. Like the old tale of buying a expensive boot vs a cheap one.

        I’m all for less power usage … but seems like a witch hunt compared to what banking gets away w. It’s the the first time banks can point the finger at someone other then themselves.

        https://www.iyops.org/post/energy-consumption-cryptocurrency-vs-traditional-banks

        • clgoh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          A system used by everybody, and a system still used by a tiny fraction of the population are using a comparable amount of energy?

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            hey, most of the crypto fans are all temporarily embarrassed billionaire libertarians anyway, so the bottom 99.5% can all eat shit and die

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          So it’s okay for crypto to consume more energy than banks because… Banks somehow limit the purchasing power of the poor?

          I don’t think I’m understanding your argument.