Utah’s Republican governor and lieutenant governor are urging the State Board of Education to take action against a conservative board member whose social media post questioning the gender of a high school basketball player incited a tirade of threats against the girl.

Natalie Cline, who has previously come under investigation for inflammatory comments about LGBTQ+ students, singled out the Salt Lake City athlete in a since-deleted Facebook post that falsely insinuated the girl was transgender. Cline later apologized for provoking a firestorm of vulgar comments after she learned that the girl was not in fact trans.

But the school board member defended her initial suspicions, saying that a national push to normalize transgender identities makes it “normal to pause and wonder if people are what they say they are.”

Many Republican politicians have successfully spread fear about transgender individuals to garner support for athletic bans and bathroom restrictions that threaten to push trans people out of community spaces. The sponsors say such policies are needed to protect women and girls. But as laws banning trans girls from girls’ sports have spread across Republican-led states, false accusations such as this have threatened the safety of both trans and non-trans youths.

  • ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gov. Cox is a complete hypocrite.

    He vetoed a bill that banned trans kids from participating in sports of their identified gender saying he errs on the side of compassion (https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2022/03/22/gov-spencer-coxs/), but more recently signed a bill banning transitioning care for trans kids (https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/29/us/utah-transgender-bill.html).

    Cox you and those who voted for these bills are not just an embarrassment to the state but actively supporting this type of mindset and behavior with this legislation!

    • DominusOfMegadeus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m questioning whether this individual is indeed human, or is in fact a skin suit full of spiders

    • Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s just Christianity and it’s a product of the conflict between the Old and New testament. It’s by design. That’s what the whole council of nicea did. The chose what was and wasn’t in the Bible and those influential people chose what worked for them. Why would they choose the letters of a pharisee who went into the desert with his followers, saw big J “after falling off a horse/camel”, and the only evidence is the word of those followers? Jesus freaking hated the Pharisee. They chose those letters because they work for them. Now we have this guide book that people can look to to justify being awesome to everyone and killing children for making fun of a bald man. The whole turn the other cheek thing is suspicious too. Sounds like something an institution that takes advantage of people would want so they can get away with screwing you over. Yah know. You HAVE to forgive them.

    • LemmynySnicket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It makes sense if you understand their truth. In their world Trans care is cutting of child dicks and child boobs and then tricking adults into being attracted to trans girls making those adults gay. 99.9% of it isn’t any of that, but to them it is at least 50% that. And as long as the rabble believe that is true they have no choice but to at least pretend to try and stop it. So the better right says stop allowing damage to children, but be nice and support the children. The worse right says pretend Trans don’t exist at all and if we law that, they will just stop pretending.

        • LemmynySnicket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Almost definitely but i just never use the words never, always, no one, all etcetera whenever making points about data you have no chance to have all of. Just takes one bad faith nit picked or example given and you now lost the high ground or worse.