Protesters angered by the planned burning of a copy of the Quran have stormed the Swedish Embassy in Baghdad, breaking into the compound and lighting a small fire.

Protesters angered by the planned burning of a copy of the Quran stormed the Swedish Embassy in Baghdad early Thursday, breaking into the compound and lighting a small fire.

  • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    3·
    1 year ago

    I am happy to see that you agree that storming an embassy is bad. Seriously because it is NOT obvious by what I replied to.

    its not obvious whether they agree that storming an embassy is bad because they didnt say anything about the matter

    I think just in general we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be (for lack of a better work) a dick. The sad thing is, we already don’t live in that world and this refugee that burned the Quran might have been burning it as a “dick move” or maybe he was burning it because he has a very real and hurtful story of how he became a refugee from Iraq.

    this does not sound like you think we should NOT act in a manner that would be considered offensive to another group just to be a dick

    it sounds like making excuses, especially for someone complaining about folks making excuses

    I can tell you I am biased toward any religion trying to tell me how to act. If I want to burn every holy book that I buy/own then I should be able to. Pushing your beliefs on others is wrong. Me burning a book doesn’t effect you unless you decide that it does. You forcing your religious laws on me does actually effect me even if I don’t believe in your religion

    someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

    What happens if I’m eating an unclean food infront of some extremist religious person? Do you think I’m trying to be offensive because I’m eating pork in public?

    we arent talking about eating unclean food in front of some extremist person, equating the two is disingenuous

    I’m not trying to schoolyard argue with you,

    uhuh

    I think giving up some acts of freedom of speech to religious extremists is a bad path to follow

    someone commenting that burning books to provoke violent outrage is vile falls under none of the above

    We shouldn’t push people to violent acts, but one could argue that the refugee himself was pushed to this “violent act” by the extremists in his home country

    the man in sweden was not pushed to burn a book because of the political climate in another country a continent away

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      2·
      1 year ago

      I think there is a lot of misunderstanding in this. I will not try to explain everything, because I feel I’m not using the correct words to explain my thoughts.

      I will reply to

      we arent talking about eating unclean food in front of some extremist person, equating the two is disingenuous>

      I was mentioning this example in order to try to explain how appeasement doesn’t work with extremists. If burning a book is so offensive that they have a call to arms then I am against them. I don’t care what book. It’s all paper.

      the man in sweden was not pushed to burn a book because of the political climate in another country a continent away>

      Oh cool. I just assumed that the political climate of his country of origin had something to do with why he was a refugee, but I guess not?

      I’m not familiar with all the details of why he was granted refugee status. I just agreed with him on principle. I’m not an edgelord, and I respect everyone’s religion in practice. Which is why I am attempting to advocate for his personal creed. Religion is personal and I respect it until someone tries to push their religious laws on someone else.