OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is in talks with investors, including from the United Arab Emirates, to raise between $5 trillion to $7 trillion in funding. The goal, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal, is to increase the world’s chip manufacturing capacity and enhance AI capabilities.

The fundraising efforts are part of a broader strategy to address OpenAI’s growth constraints, particularly the scarcity of AI chips needed for training large language models like ChatGPT.

Altman’s proposal is said to include forming a partnership with investors, chip manufacturers, and power providers to finance the construction of chip foundries, which would then be operated by the chip manufacturers.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Came here to say this. Does she know how much money there is in the world? He is asking for basically 1/20th of all the money in the world. Even if that was possible it would be dangerous for one company to hold that much.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Money can be created by banks via loans, you can just make it up.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        But then you end up with inflation. So in the process of creating money you’ve reduced the value of the money. And banks working in cooperation with government create money. Private companies outside of the banking system can’t create their own money anymore. If any sizable portion of this is taken out as a loan. It creates a systemic risk for the world economy.

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Banks most certainly make up money today via loans. This happens all the time.

          • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            But this isn’t a bank. And making money doesn’t come without consequences. You’re not thinking about second and third order effects. This would basically be quantitative easing on a grand scale but for just one company. It would literally destroy the economy if the investment failed. And they aren’t the only player in the industry. The level of systemic risk is too large. And if it didn’t fail, it would basically be handing the world economy over to one player.