• andrew_bidlaw
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    God brought us different, but Colt made us equal, blah-blah-blah.

    The difference between trained criminal who started and dictate the situation and an unprepared civilian is just too big. Not to say about how seeing a gun or a sudden movement would trigger an instant attack. You overestimate reflexes of a regular person and their ability to use firearms. Self-defence gun in a bag is more of a risk for an owner and others rather than an affective detterent.

    Guns should be. Under the lock. People who casually carry them around just in case aren’t a solution but a problem themselves.

    • TheSlad
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      People who everyday carry guns, open or concealed, are either paranoid chicken-shit cowards or trigger-happy wannabe vigilante heroes. Neither is a desirable state of mind.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          While I don’t blame them and it’s the last group I’d go after, the contention still holds true: a frightened untrained person with a deadly weapon is more likely to cause another problem than to solve the first one

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Gun supporter here: you make a very good point and it’s why I think people should have to go through extensive training before being allowed to own one. Way more so than for a drivers license.

      • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or women defending themselves from stalkers or absuive exes. Or LGBTQ people defending themselves from much, much higher rates of assault than average. I know it’s easy to get sucked into the us-vs-them mentality, but please remember there are plenty of people out there who have damn good reasons to carry.

        • GooseFinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sir, this is Lemmy. All we do here is call gun owners small-wienered piss baby cowards. Nuanced discussion is allowed for everything else, but the moment you imply that guns aren’t evil machines only used for crime, you’re a brain dead Christian devout who gets off to school shootings and cowboy fantasies.

    • TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not even just guns, in the UK people who carry knives around are more likely to be stabbed than people who don’t carry them. That’s why there are so many laws about when you’re allowed to have one with you even if you need it for work.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Self-defence gun in a bag is more of a risk for an owner and others rather than an affective detterent.

      You missed the obvious solution:

      You need a sniper covering your position whenever you are in public.