Even if you don’t group meat and vegetables in naive ways you still reach the same conclusion:
“Regardless of whether you compare the footprint of foods in terms of their weight (e.g. one kilogram of cheese versus one kilogram of peas); protein content ; or calories, the overall conclusion is the same: plant-based foods tend to have a lower carbon footprint than meat and dairy. In many cases a much smaller footprint.”
Vegan agenda?
Veganism is first and foremost a movement to avoid harming non-human animals, the environmental benefits are a huge bonus really.
Overall plant based is clearly best, here’s the data.
https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local
https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food
Yep, that’s the agenda; it’s the vegan agenda disguised in an environmental piece.
If it was purely environmental, it wouldn’t group “meat” and “vegetables” in a naive way like that.
Even if you don’t group meat and vegetables in naive ways you still reach the same conclusion:
“Regardless of whether you compare the footprint of foods in terms of their weight (e.g. one kilogram of cheese versus one kilogram of peas); protein content ; or calories, the overall conclusion is the same: plant-based foods tend to have a lower carbon footprint than meat and dairy. In many cases a much smaller footprint.”
Is the IPCC vegan propaganda too?
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357