So I just discovered that I have been working next to the waste of oxygen that raped my best friend several years ago. I work in a manufacturing environment and I know that you can’t fire someone just for being a sex offender unless it directly interferes with work duties (in the US). But despite it being a primarily male workforce he does work with several women who have no idea what he is. He literally followed a woman home, broke into her house, and raped her. Him working here puts every female employee at risk. How is that not an unsafe working environment? How is it at even legal to employ him anywhere where he will have contact with women?

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      161·
      11 months ago

      If that’s what you want to happen to you, I’m sure we can help

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      13·
      11 months ago

      So we shouldn’t try to reform people - just piss away a human life at a cost of $14K-$70K per year to the taxpayers in what’s already the most incercerated population in the world, where it’s well established that the threat of prison does nothing to reduce crime, and there would be no puntitve difference between a single rape and a spree?

      Got any more of those great takes you’d like to share?

      • sirjash@feddit.de
        31·
        11 months ago

        It’s even more dire, because where in the developed world can you incarcerate someone for 14k? I would estimate that depending on the kind of treatment these people get, you’re looking at costs of at least 50% GDP/capita, if not more.

        US GDP/capita is around 70k USD, average costs per inmate per year are around 40k USD.

        Germany GDP/capita is 46k EUR, average cost per inmate are at around 43k EUR.

        So essentially we either kill them or house them inhumanely like livestock forever, OR we reintegrate them and use incarceration as a last resort, there is no other way. People who advocate for life in prison for anything but murder have no clue what they’re talking about.