cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6091515

Sorry forgot to crop the photo - fixed

To keep it vaguely educational here is the Russian word for hedgehog is ёж or for non Cyrillic enjoyers ‘yozh’.

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    225 months ago

    I assume it didn’t work well? It just has that feel about it…?

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      275 months ago

      88 individual guns that can jam, and can’t be cleared until you land again. 88 individual guns that have to be removed, cleaned, checked, lubricated and reinstalled every flight. 88 individual drum magazines that have to be reloaded, manually. If we assume a very quick 15 minute field-strip maintenance & reload per gun, that’s 22 man-hours of work every flight just for the guns, not counting the work needed to get them out of that contraption and then back into it again.

      Wikipedia says the rate of fire of the PPSh-41 is 1250 rpm, so you’re emptying that 71-round drum in 3.4s. An entire day of maintenance for less than 4 seconds of highly innacurate anti-infantry fire, basically just suppression fire.

      Plus the effective range of the PPSh-41 is ~200m, so you’re a nice low-flying target.

      So yeah, your feeling is correct. This is a waste of time and effort, plus high risk for the airplane and crew.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        95 months ago

        Plus they are all pointing in the same direction. Is 80 bullets pointed at the same.spot any better than 10?

        You would think three rows of 10 guns with the center row pointed down and the outer rows at a slight angle would give better coverage for less maintenance and be just as deadly.

      • @vaultdweller013
        link
        English
        85 months ago

        I will give tacit defense of the Soviets on this abomination. It practically screams “fuck we aint got no bombs” and this was the result after finding a crate of PLSH-41s. Waste of time? Yes. Waste of manpower? Yes. Waste of effort? No. When in a rough spot ya throw shit at the wall and see what sticks, who knows maybe the R&D for this piece of shit led to something useful.

      • @mindbleach
        link
        English
        15 months ago

        Single-fire would be much more interesting, as you could pull the trigger for a tight volley. It’s basically a semi-auto shotgun blast with obscenely large pellets.

        But yeah, they might’ve been better-off gluing tailfins to the bullets and dropping the damn things like lawn darts.

    • MeanEYE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      It’s a soviet plane. Of course it didn’t work well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m going to start calling my weed drawer The Bomb Bay.

    You may now continue your weapon talk.

  • MeanEYE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    55 months ago

    And it worked exactly zero times. Soviets had a number of “great” ideas until they didn’t work. Kind of how they had to paint the roads yellow for their guided missiles to work, or how they welded pipes on MiG-9 to look badass for airshow when in fact it didn’t have a useful gun. They also had chemical warfare bomber which was their long range plane which they repurposed by cutting fuel containers in half and replaced other half with poison containers. Until they realized they would have to fly very low for it to be effective but short range and huge size made it an easy target.

    And yes, both links are from the same channel. It’s not a big channel but it has very interesting and well researched content. So check it out.