• BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nzOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I used to think he was stupid but now I am convinced he is just evil. A sociopath basically.

    • flambonkscious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been thinking his facial expressions are not too dissimilar top Boris Johnson mussing up his hair…

      I guess I’m disappointed he’s not more original…

        • flambonkscious
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sorry, I’m lost… what does neuro-divergence have to do with this?

          • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Asbergers, autistic or otherwise neurodivergent people etc often come across as odd, weird, or strange to neurotypical people, and are often treated poorly as a result.

            Your comment is just another example of that.

            • flambonkscious
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, you might be right. I finally watched the debate (good stuff!) and realised I’d never seen him in person. I think I’ve judged him on his appearance? Not proud of that

              I disagree with the guy and if he’s neurospicy he sure handles it well!

              But I find it much more interesting thinking about the current state of things that underlies a lot of what they’re talking about. In recent years (decades?), it seems the govt has sought to ‘undo’ the injustices of the past through treaty settlements and so on, essentially it appears they’re trying to reverse the systemic racism we have which is objectively a good thing…

              Lots of people complain of the favourable treatment that is sometimes shown to Maori and_ in a sense_, they’re right - it is reverse racism, but how else can one change a culture and system of society?

              I think Seymour’s wrong here, where he seeks to discard race entirely, as if saying ‘there is no racism in NZ’ will solve the issue (but he’s not wrong in trying to ascertain more accurate contributing factors, like shitty housing, say - are we being intellectually lazy by focusing on race?).

              I’m more interested in the thought experiment of how we judge that the pendulum has swung far enough and when do we get off this seesaw when we reckon it’s level.

              That’s a long way off, fortunately. I’ve got no good ideas, but I suspect reverse racism is the only tool we’ve got? - even if it’s a bit shit (like democracy)

              • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                That whole reverse racism, positive discrimination thing has always felt like an engineering approach to a social problem. Like power factor correction or active noise reduction, let’s create an equal and opposite racism to counteract the existing racism and the two will cancel each other out.

                • flambonkscious
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That’s an interesting idea, I like the comparison.

                  I suspect humans are too fiddly / it’s too crude a mechanism, but I’m no poli-sci major!

                  I suppose it’s just two competing racism sources, which is better than a single one but only if you ‘squint right’.