• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    actual substantive difference between the 2.

    One party wants to deny me access to healthcare: they want to make it illegal for me to continue taking the testosterone I have taken for almost a decade. They would force me to carry a pregnancy to term, even if it was deformed and could kill me. They are making it illegal for teachers to even refer to a kid by the name they prefer. They are attacking things like free school lunches and even the department of education itself. Their figurehead has repeatedly flouted the rule of law and has told us loud and clear that he would like to be a dictator.

    Yeah, Dems fucking suck. The ACA was garbage, the Clinton’s crime bill was garbage. The Democratic Party fucks over actual leftists all the time.

    But there is most certainly a substantive difference between the 2.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      But there is most certainly a substantive difference between the 2.

      Yes, that diminishes with each passing year. Like I said.

      • naught
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If the common sentiment that we’re more divided than ever is accurate, how could this possibly be true? Wouldn’t the differences grow? Can you name policy positions that are identical between parties? If I look at healthcare, taxation, infrastructure, education, foreign policy, welfare, business regulation, environmental policy, social issues etc. it is pretty clear cut to me. How do you justify your both-side-ism?

        • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Here’s a possible example. While Bernie Sanders has proposed pegging minimum wage to inflation, neither the Republicans nor the Democrats support this. My belief is that it is more important to have something to fight about than to win. If minimum wage just quietly tracks inflation, then there is nothing for Democrats to claim victory over when it does go up.

          This kind of apparent unending struggle without progress is shit, but it suits the status quo on both sides, even in the face of eternal media telling us how we are more divided.

          Now, it is possible to fuck this up, as with abortion. The Republicans forgot that they weren’t actually supposed to win, and they have been rightly punished. The Democrats share some blame for not doing much to ensure abortion rights, since they naively thought that the Republicans understood the game.

          • naught
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks this is a good example! however I think the conspiracy about Democrats wanting a big win instead of what’s good for the people is probably not true, especially absent of evidence.

            The min wage is ticking up in more places (and it is not at the behest of republicans…), and the Biden admin increased wages in the places they could (fed workers) via executive order.

            It totally makes sense to be annoyed at the glacial pace of progress in the United States, but we can’t possibly pretend that there is an equivalence between the two choices that we are presented with.