e; I wrote a better headline than the ABC editors decided to and excerpted a bit more

According to the poll, conducted using Ipsos’ Knowledge Panel, 86% of Americans think Biden, 81, is too old to serve another term as president. That figure includes 59% of Americans who think both he and former President Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner, are too old and 27% who think only Biden is too old.

Sixty-two percent of Americans think Trump, who is 77, is too old to serve as president. There is a large difference in how partisans view their respective nominees – 73% of Democrats think Biden is too old to serve but only 35% of Republicans think Trump is too old to serve. Ninety-one percent of independents think Biden is too old to serve, and 71% say the same about Trump.

Concerns about both candidates’ ages have increased since September when an ABC News/Washington Post poll found that 74% of Americans thought Biden – the oldest commander in chief in U.S. history – was too old to serve another term as president, and 49% said the same about Trump.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240214133801/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/poll-americans-on-biden-age/story?id=107126589

Part that drew my eye,

The poll also comes days after the Senate failed to advance a bipartisan foreign aid bill with major new border provisions.

Americans find there is blame to go around on Congress’ failure to pass legislation intended to decrease the number of illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border – with about the same number blaming the Republicans in Congress (53%), the Democrats (51%) and Biden (49%). Fewer, 39%, blame Trump.

More Americans trust that Trump would do a better job of handling immigration and the situation at the border than Biden – 44%-26% – according to the poll.

So that bipartisan border bill stunt was terrible policy, and it doesn’t seem to have done anything for the Democratic party politically

Can we please stop trying to compromise with fascists now?

  • abraxas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    You say “better options” but a clear majority of Democrats thought Biden was the better option. And all the other candidates that anyone took seriously are in the same age range as them. Nobody younger knocked on the door with a platform really worth backing. Buttigieg had no Federal chops whatsoever, Harris was a freaking prosecutor.

    Or if you’re just talking “better in general”, then you’re talking about the Progressives war. Bernie still hasn’t realized he’ll never win a Primary, and the way his campaign sabotaged and undercut Warren’s with necessary voting demographics was a killshot. Grassroot movements to call her a secret Republican. They should be ashamed of themselves.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Didn’t Warren’s campaign just shoot itself in the foot, trying to play political games rather than focusing on things like policies? I never saw anyone call her a secret Republican. Just someone who picked incompetent people who run her campaign.

      • abraxas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean…no. Her campaign was arguably the polar opposite of that to her detriment. She said she wanted to do something. Then she wrote up a detailed plan for it and published it, letting the other candidates find something in the details they didn’t like and tear it apart.

        She’s a policy wonk who is a law professor first and a politician second.

        I never saw anyone call her a secret Republican

        There were a lot of “grassroots” youtube videos that came out and took lines of hers out of context. They would softball questions like “Warren is just as good as Bernie because they vote the same a lot, right? WRONG! Warren is a capitalist pretending to be progressive to steal your vote”. And those grassroot video efforts started to trace back to Sanders campaign leadership. Nobody ever quite confirmed if Bernie directly knew his campaign was doing it, but the rule is usually that the campaign’s action sare the candidate’s responsibility.

          • abraxas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            She was specifically asked if she had a conversation with Bernie where he said a very specific sentence. Nobody knows where the media got that information, but she answered truthfully and moved on. Then Bernie denied it up and down and turned it political.

            How do we know who told the truth? Because they hot-micced her at the end trying to talk to him, shocked at how he accused her of lying on national TV.

            If one had anything bad to say about Warren it’s that she didn’t know how to fight dirty anymore than Mcain did in his campaign. I’d buy that.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      You say “better options” but a clear majority of Democrats thought Biden was the better option.

      Were they right?

      • abraxas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        He did better than he promised at basically everything. I really wanted someone who would push the envelope to the Left, but he never promised that and a lot of Democratic voters didn’t want that anyway. He did recover us from COVID and dramatically improve the economy. He attempted some things that were more progressive than I expected of him, with various levels of success.

        EDIT: he also compromised more with the Left than any president since Carter. Not much, but something

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like you’re fine with the way things are working then.

          I will not be voting for Joe Biden in 2024. I will be voting 3rd party.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re asking for an opinion.

        A majority of Democrats thought Biden was the better option and despite the complaints of terminally online leftists, it appears they still do.

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I personally liked Bernie but he sounded like a broken record at times. In hindsight I have my doubts he’d have won in the general anyway. Biden was easily the strongest candidate, who do you think was better?

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Biden was easily the strongest candidate

              This is an admission you believe people would rather lose to fascists than compromise with leftists.

              I won’t be voting for Biden in 2024. I will be voting 3rd party.

              who do you think was better?

              Anyone but Biden or Bloomberg was a better choice.

              • Linkandluke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                If you are voting third party, instead of for Biden. Aren’t you saying you’d rather lose to fascist then vote for Biden?

                Because at the end of the day, it’s Biden vs Trump. A vote for Biden, is be a vote against Trump and vice versa.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If you are voting third party, instead of for Biden. Aren’t you saying you’d rather lose to fascist then vote for Biden?

                  You could certainly make that argument. Would that make me selfish and foolish?

                  • Linkandluke@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    If you don’t want fascism, I be would say it’s foolish. I be wouldn’t say it’s selfish tho. I don’t really understand what selfish about it.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Brother I don’t even think the vast majority of the electorate can define fascist much less decide they’d rather have that than compromise with leftists.

                Anyone but Biden or Bloomberg was a better choice.

                Clinging to ideological purity while you lose elections isn’t how you get a seat at the table. It’s how you lose.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I have the same message for moderates.

                  I won’t be voting for Joe Biden in the 2024 primaries. I will be voting 3rd party. When they’re ready to let go of their ideological purity and compromise with leftists and progressives I’ll be here.