• kakes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeesh people here are salty.

    Honestly, if they make it optional and/or give the option to run it locally, I could see this being a good thing.

    Lord knows the competition is going full bore on AI, and if FF wants to stay relevant with the mass market they’ll need to keep up.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It depends on what they mean by AI. I can think of oodles of great uses:

      • An AI-powered adblock that removes all trackers, cookie confirmation popups, those annoying “please subscribe” popups, etc. would be badass. It would be virtually invisible but it would make the internet usable again.
      • A content filter that magically extracts the recipe you’re looking for out of the stupid blog post they write for SEO
      • Or to expand on that, an AI that goes through the page of search engine results and removes the ones that are SEO spam instead of actually useful content
      • An AI that can review at a page or email and determine if it’s a scam would save a TON of people by pointing out suspicious features.
      • Basically anything that requires you to copy data from one context to another is a good use of AI. You could probably have a nice resume-filling feature, for example.

      But yeah, Mozilla will probably just go for a “chat with your browser” feature. Total waste of space.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          The only reason this would be an issue is if it’s sending that data off to a third party. If its fully local, who cares what data it sees?

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The requirements to run good local LLMs have really been shrinking this past year… I have a lot of faith that there is a generally useful yet tiny AI tool within the grasp of Mozilla.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I can understand your thinking, but it could be as simple as giving the user the option to outsource the computation to a secure something or other, if their machine can’t handle it.

              And yeah, the requirements are still quite high, but they are being reduced somewhat steadily, so I wouldn’t be surprised if average hardware could manage it in the long term.

              Edit: For the record, Mozilla is one of the only companies I would trust if they said “the secure something or other is actually secure.” And they’d likely show actual proof and provide and explanation as to how.

          • kakes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pennomi wrote a whole list of potential ideas. And honestly, while I agree that local LLMs on typical hardware are underpowered for most tasks, it’s possible they would have the option for those that can run it.

            People are getting all upset over this announcement without even knowing what their plan actually is, like the word “AI” is making them foam at the mouth or something. I’m just saying we should reserve judgements for when we have an idea of what’s happening.