So here is some evidence your you published by NBC (you do not get any more woke or left then that) about the long term sustained advantage of trans athletes.
I don’t have any horses in this race, my problem is that your comment breaks rule 1.
Yes there is some evidence that there is some advantage that may inhibit meaningful competition and that is perhaps something that could have been discussed if you had not expressed your opinion in the way you did.
The above article provides some expert opinion and is quite useful leading to the basic conclusion that this should be handled case-by-case, as is what seems to be what will happen.
I think this post is in violation of the instance rules. Plus it manages to be transphobic and sexist at the same time.
Including evidence to back the opinion presented by this post would cause not to violate the rules and allow for insightful discussion.
So here is some evidence your you published by NBC (you do not get any more woke or left then that) about the long term sustained advantage of trans athletes.
I don’t have any horses in this race, my problem is that your comment breaks rule 1.
Yes there is some evidence that there is some advantage that may inhibit meaningful competition and that is perhaps something that could have been discussed if you had not expressed your opinion in the way you did.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/61346517
The above article provides some expert opinion and is quite useful leading to the basic conclusion that this should be handled case-by-case, as is what seems to be what will happen.