• Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why would air Canada even fight this? He got a couple hundred bucks and they paid at least 50k in lawyer fees to fight paying those. They could have just given him the cost of the lawyer’s fees and be done with it

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      112
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because now they have to stop using the chatbot or take on the liability of having to pay out whenever it fucks up.

      • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is fascinating, that they themselves thought there was any doubt about it, or they could argue such a doubt.

        This is the same like arguing “It wasn’t me who shot the mailmen dead. It was my automated home self defense system”

        • frunch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          Agree 100%–i mean who are you gonna fine, the bot? The company that sold you the bot? This is a simple case of garbage in, garbage out–if they set it up properly and vetted its operation, they wouldn’t be trying to make such preposterous objections. I’m glad this went to court where it was definitively shut down.

          Fuck Canada Air. The guy already lost a loved one, now they wanna drag him through all this over a pittance? To me, this is the corporate mindset–going to absolutely any length necessary to hoover up more money, even the smallest of scraps.

    • marth_21@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      Most likely to fight the precedent of them being liable for using an ai chatbot that gives faulty information.

      • brianorca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        A settlement would cost less, can be kept private, and doesn’t set precedent. Now they have an actual court case judgement, and that does set precedent.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think some companies have a policy of fighting every lawsuit and making everything take as long as possible, simply to discourage more lawsuits.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because there is something far nastier in the world than self interest. This airline seems to me like it was operating from a place of spite.

      • Patches
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a corporation. Of course it’s operating from a place of spite.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just how Air Canada does things now. I think it largely stemmed from the pandemic where people gave them leeway on things being a bit messed up. But now they’ve fallen into a habit of not taking responsibility for anything.