• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 months ago

    In standard xbox/Microsoft form “{other company} has been extremely successful in their product, we’re going to take that idea, make a weird alteration, lock it into the microsoft environment, and then put it out 4 years too late, just in time for {other company} to come out with a better one”

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Better than most, but still compared to the ipad, just too little too late. Even in the business market they still love the ipad, when the surface is obviously better as a tablet in a company…

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There’s always Azure. I suppose that’s less comparable because it’s a business product in the same way Surface is primarily a business line. Either way, I hope they make something cool that competes with the Steam Deck cause the windows handhelds that have come out are very underwhelming.

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Plus the simultaneous backup method of publishing their stuff on other platforms.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Nobody needs insider knowledge or so to deduce that after the success of the Steam Deck which is literally based on a very similar architecture to both Xbox Series and PS5 both companies are prototyping their own variants, at the very least by doing quick and dirty ports of their operating systems to one of the existing off the shelf products of which none has a locked bootloader.

    That’s just totally obvious. What we don’t know is if the higher ups decided to pursue this into production quality homegrown hardware.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In an interview with the Verge accompanying yesterday’s “multi-platform” business announcement, Microsoft Xbox CEO Phil Spencer was asked directly about any handheld hardware plans, including his recent penchant for liking some social media posts discussing handheld game consoles.

    Spencer gave even more direct hints along the same lines in an interview with Bloomberg, where he mentioned “early plans” for new consoles and promised, “We’re going to be able to do more innovative things in hardware, the more the game side of the business is having success.”

    He added that he “get[s] excited about different form factors that allow people to play in different places,” which sure sounds like the kind of thing a portable game console allows for.

    Rumors of a Microsoft gaming portable are far from new, dating back to at least the Xbox 360 era and popping up periodically ever since.

    Today, Microsoft’s line of Surface laptop-tablets has spent over a decade successfully establishing its place in a competitive market.

    Maybe Microsoft will take some of those Surface lessons forward if it decides to enter the handheld gaming market for the first time.


    The original article contains 691 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!