Thought of you fine folks when I came across this article on aussie.zone

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like the PV panels on the side are just gratuitous. Can’t imagine they’d contribute much, right?

    • badlilbean
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      “When it’s not plugged into the home the van’s batteries are being charged by a 1-kilowatt panel on its roof and small panels on the sides which charge the indicators and lights.”

    • hazeebabee@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I could see them adding a significant charge in morning/late afternoon when the sun is low. Im dont actually know though lol

    • perestroika@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You’re correct. Only the roof is likely to give significant power. Been there and done that, on the opposite side of the planet though. :)

      The “something” on the picture I attach… was built in some squat in Eastern Europe. It had a flat roof of approximately 2 x 1.5 m, all of it solar panel. Solar panels weren’t great back then. Typically it charged its 4 KWh battery in a few days of sunshine. Only during midsummer (18-hour days) was there any chance of a full charge in a single day.

      Unlike the van, the “something” required a smaller inventory of tools to build. Instead of lawnmower motors, a Chinese electric motorcycle motor was used. Sadly it’s now retired due to metal fatigue. :( Lesson: never build a structure that flexes out of aluminum - aluminum has no fatigue limit, any flexing will lead to cracking.