Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Plastics companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regardless, Center for Climate Integrity study findswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkPlastics companies knew for decades recycling was not viable but promoted it regardless, Center for Climate Integrity study findswww.theguardian.comDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareÐ Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前I mean we kinda knew that already didn’t we? There’s literally classes of plastics that are specifically labeled as not being recyclable
minus-squareGlitterInfection@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 年前All plastic recycling is bad for the environment. Virtually all of it. The only purpose recycling serves is to push the blame for plastics waste onto the consumer. It was a very effective marketing campaign, and nothing good.
I mean we kinda knew that already didn’t we? There’s literally classes of plastics that are specifically labeled as not being recyclable
All plastic recycling is bad for the environment. Virtually all of it. The only purpose recycling serves is to push the blame for plastics waste onto the consumer.
It was a very effective marketing campaign, and nothing good.