• Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    VW probably had way more cars involved though, so the cost per car was lower.

    • Desmond373@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldnt underestimate how many cummins engines there are, lots of trucks, tractors and other large machines use them, some of which run constantly. If anything i would say they got off lighter than VW

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      VW also has a revenue that’s almost 10x as much as Cummins. It’s a “cost of doing business” write off for both of them, but a more expensive one for Cummins comparatively

    • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And VW cratered due to consumer backlash. For Cummins, this is a marketing opportunity.