• SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TLDR

    Because Valve asked Nintendo if it was allowed, and Nintendo said it shouldn’t (pretty please), so Valve asked Dolphin to ask Nintendo if they could. Dolphin’s team finds of obviously impossible to accomplish.

    • SPOOSER@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s smart on Valve’s part. With how litigation-happy Nintendo is, I don’t think Valve really wants to go to bat for a program that isn’t even their own, and isn’t even needed on Steam anyway.

      • kingthrillgore@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Valve is lawsuit averse. They sacked NFT games and AI generated games for similar reasons.

        By the same extent, Valve is so based.

      • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plus it helps leave the door open for a potential partnership if Nintendo ever decides to bring some of their games to PC. I think it will happen at some point because there is both a growing frustration with having to re-buy your library with every new Nintendo system and a lot of profit to be made on PC if you approach it like Sony has.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That growing frustration ain’t doing shit to stop people from rebuying. Even if we get to the point where there’s 10 pissed off fans for every 1 buyer, it’s pretty much free money for Nintendo.

          I hope I’m wrong but I think we’re several generations away from that. I think what’s more likely is game licensing getting tied to your Nintendo Home account (or whatever it’s called, I don’t have a Switch) and being accessible on new consoles…for a fee, of course.

          • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I think PC only happens when potential PC sales eclipse those rebuys and not one second before. Might be several generations away tbh.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t all nintendo consoles been backwards compatible since the Wii though? Don’t Nintendo store games bought on the Wii work on the switch?

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Wii U and the 3DS can be hacked to be incredibly backwards compatible. Wii U can run Wii and GameCube games natively, straight on the hardware, and the 3DS can do that for the old DS and GBA.

            The Switch can do none of that, everything they got is ported or emulated.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t understand, why are people mad that Nintendo isn’t allowing a random person to make money off its intellectual property and consoles? Why would or should they? There’s nothing for them to gain