Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) Friday, requesting that an ethics watchdog “immediately” initiate a review of Greene’s conduct after she …

  • wagesj45@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As repulsive a move as this is, I’m afraid that the DC law almost certainly won’t apply in this case. This was done as part of her official “speech” as a representative.

    The speech and debate clause, which appears in Article 1, section 6, of the U.S. Constitution, was written before the First Amendment and has a more limited scope.

    The clause, whose inclusion reflected the development in England of an independent Parliament, states that “for any Speech or Debate in either House, they [members] shall not be questioned in any other Place.” It follows a provision, now largely moot, that prevents the arrest, for civil cases, of members traveling to or from sessions of Congress.

    • instamat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But what about the message she sent to the people on her email list? Surely that doesn’t have the same protections of the speech and debate clause.

      • wagesj45@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on what a court decides “in either house” to mean. Does it mean physically in the House or Senate chambers? Does it mean “in furtherance of their duties as a congressperson”? I know how I would rule, but I don’t know how the Supreme Court would rule.

              • MomoTimeToDie
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why do you hate that the court actually respects the constitution?

                • instamat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not so much that as the bribery and corruption allegations that a few of the justices have seen recently. That calls into question their integrity and objectivity.

                  • MomoTimeToDie
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol make up retarded allegations and then make up rules to punish people for them. Who’s the corrupt one again?