What to post:

Yes:

  • Weird surreal image edit art
  • Visual jokes
  • Images that have been photoshopped to depict or mean something else than the original.
  • Sbubby (logos or other text images edited)

No:

  • Memes
  • Politically motivated posts
  • NSFW
  • AI generated images or automatic filters:
    • Using generated images in source material is OK, but the “photoshop” part must be real human labour.
  • Posts where the subject’s identity is the sole point.
    • Negative posts will receive a stricter interpretation. We want to avoid hate trains, even if the subject is a real POS.

Comments are open for further discussion and suggestions.

  • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What if we avoid politics? This year is already getting out of hand in the USA with the lead up to the presidential election in November. Photoshop has an ability to start big, ugly arguments quickly.

    • Bezier@suppo.fiOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I actually just thought about politics and bad faith posts. Again, gotta come up with a clear definition, but I want to at least avoid posts that are clearly politically motivated.

  • Bezier@suppo.fiOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sbubby-ish posts: yea or nay?

    • Halo Kitty
    • Barbie Doom Horse Adventures
    • Wookies
  • Bezier@suppo.fiOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    No posts targeted at a person is probably a good rule.

    Not OK:

    • Posts where the subject’s identity is the sole point.

    OK:

    • Posts where the subject’s identity plays a part, but the focus is on something else. For example, the subject could be doing something interesting, wearing a strange outfit.
  • threelonmusketeers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Rule suggestion: Top-level comments on image prompt posts must contain an edited version of the image. Further discussion is allowed as replies to the top-level comments.

    Thoughts?

    • Bezier@suppo.fiOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Separating discussion isn’t a bad idea. Could also reserve one top-level comment for a collapsible discussion thread.

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You might want to take an official position on dank.

    Some find that corruption/rot/evil is too-much, others want it to overwhelm the world, because it is “their thing”.

    Pick a side.