The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a challenge to a federal ban on gun "bump stocks" in a case that could affect thousands of gun-owning Americans.
The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.
I’m not opposed to every restriction. I’m just opposed to most restrictions.
The bump stock isn’t even about the 2nd. It’s about can the atf change the meanings of words.
While I don’t mind the ban. The logic is bad and that’s why the ban should be overturned. It does not create a machine gun. It does not meet the requirements of the law.
And unlike you, I’m not a bootlicker
Be civil.
The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.
Removed by mod
The prohibition of functional components of an arm is reasonably an infringement of the right to bear arms.
How? Do you think Scalia didn’t know what he was talking about ?
I think he’s carrying water for his political buddies that have a vested interest in restricting our rights
He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?
I’m aware he’s dead. But unfortunately his impact isn’t.
I’m not opposed to every restriction. I’m just opposed to most restrictions. The bump stock isn’t even about the 2nd. It’s about can the atf change the meanings of words. While I don’t mind the ban. The logic is bad and that’s why the ban should be overturned. It does not create a machine gun. It does not meet the requirements of the law.
OK bootlicker. Neither the atf nor any restrictions on arms should exist whatsoever