• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    In corrupt countries does the government ever prosecute people for political reasons?

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Gosh, as a citizen of the United States I just can’t imagine what goes on in a corrupt country. LOL

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Fraudulent prosecution is a thing, so this particular prosecution is fraudulent. Hmmm, seems like you missed a few steps there.

          Look at the documents case. They bent over backwards to try and get those documents back quietly and let Trump off the hook. If you or I had those documents, we wouldn’t even be given the opportunity to hand them over. We would have SWAT coming through our door, and we would be hauled straight to solitary. A two tiered Justice system exists, but it isn’t what folks like you think.

          That’s the end of my patience for taking you seriously.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of all of the things, the document case is the only one that works, the problem is that all the various presidents have been guilty of it, and Hillary did much worse and had nothing done to her.

            But you need to look at the combination of all of the cases, and how they have half a billion on two bul1shit cases. The problem is the MAGA people are going to be correct that the election was tampered with if trump loses. I am a trump voter, but I can see the dangers.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              There is a big difference between civil and criminal cases. Anyways, the fact that he was found liable in both cases would tend to indicate they weren’t “bullshit”. In fact, they were both absolutely straightforward cases with solid evidence that Trump did exactly what he was accused of.

              I really, really don’t give a shit what MAGA morons think about anything. Anyone still MAGA at this point is too far gone for me to care.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Anyways, the fact that he was found liable in both cases would tend to indicate they weren’t “bullshit”

                Sure they were, I know real estate very well, and that case was nonsense. Also do you know the details of the rape case?

                You should care what “MAGA morons” think because they have a lot of guns and they have gotten rightfully angrier by the year. Think about how all of us are mad at what they have been doing with the currency and inflation, and then add in the feeling that they are getting cheated at the ballot box too.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I see no indication that you are capable of knowing anything well. It wasn’t a “rape” case, it was a defamation case.

                  If you have any MAGA buddies, you might want to clue them into the fact that much of the left is well armed too, and we don’t get winded on the way to the fridge for another beer.

                  If they wanna play like domestic terrorists again, they will be handled again.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It was a rape case that trump was not allowed to defend himself. She is a crazy person, there should never have been a case.

                    If they wanna play like domestic terrorists again, they will be handled again.

                    Let me get this straight, the last civil war was at that time one of the deadliest wars in history, and you are cool with it happening again?

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                She had a server of secret or top secret (I dont know which) information at her house and in her email. And when the government asked for the data, they destroyed some of the evidence.