Although I agree with this bill, the NYT calling it “strict new ethics rules” is a bit much. Reading the requirements in the bill itself, it struck me as legislating that SCOTUS justices do the bare ethical minimum required of most every other judge - in other words, it’s the type of bill that shows up when an organization demonstrates that it is incapable of self-policing.

What’s shocking is 100% opposition by Republicans to a bill requiring a Justice to recuse if a close family member receives a large gift from a litigant - literally, that’s in the bill.

How is this controversial? Senator Graham says why - requiring the court to act ethically will “destroy” the court. He’s saying, we don’t care if justices are ethical so long as they’re partisan.

Congress needs to step up here.

  • LexiconDexicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool

    Now do the same with Congress and I bet half of them would resign, both democrats and republicans are human garbage when it comes to “ethics”

    • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m honestly surprised that people are so partisan, instead of saying “fuck them all, we want change!”

      It’s 2023 and people are rooting their entire identity based on their political party. It’s madness.

    • naught
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      both sides 🤪

      though you’re not entirely wrong