GreyShuck@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months agoTwo charged for pouring porridge and jam on Queen Victoria bust in Glasgowwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down12
arrow-up187arrow-down1external-linkTwo charged for pouring porridge and jam on Queen Victoria bust in Glasgowwww.theguardian.comGreyShuck@feddit.uk to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down8·edit-29 months agoWhich is owned by the city, they damaged a statue owned by the city. Big fucking deal mate. No one was actually hurt.
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·9 months agoSo there was no victims ofJanuary 6th either because the capital building is publicly owned too?
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·9 months agoYou’re right, defacing a statue is the same as attempting insurrection, doubly so where people were assaulted or died. That’s your fucking amazing retort is it?
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·9 months agoMy retort is that “it’s publicly owned so it’s fine if anyone destroys it” is a stupid argument no matter who makes it
minus-squareDeceptichumlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·9 months agoIt’s called nuance. Not everything is exactly the same in the world.
Which is owned by the city, they damaged a statue owned by the city.
Big fucking deal mate. No one was actually hurt.
So there was no victims ofJanuary 6th either because the capital building is publicly owned too?
You’re right, defacing a statue is the same as attempting insurrection, doubly so where people were assaulted or died.
That’s your fucking amazing retort is it?
My retort is that “it’s publicly owned so it’s fine if anyone destroys it” is a stupid argument no matter who makes it
It’s called nuance.
Not everything is exactly the same in the world.