• GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    There’s definitely value in not constantly being tethered to a device reminding you how many steps you’ve taken, e-mails, etc. Also I’m reminded me of a quote:

    “Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.” ― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 months ago

      ape-descended

      It’s very popular to call humans some variant of this, and while it’s correct, it also implies that humans are no longer apes. They are.

        • wowbagger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          well they were entirely made up of account executives, insurance salesmen, and management consultants so I think it’s still fair to call them “ape-descended”

      • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is true, there are two kinds of animal, monkey or ape. Because if it doesn’t have a tail it’s not a monkey, even if it’s a monkey kinda shape. If it doesn’t have a tail it’s not a monkey, if it doesn’t have a tail…it’s an ape!

        Or at least that’s what I learned from my parents force feeding me nothing but VeggieTales for far too long.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yup, that’s correct! Primates without tails are apes, and we’re a primate without a tail.

          • StephniBefni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well what they applied the example to was a cow, citing that due to its tail out was a monkey of course lol. But yeah it does apply to primates for sure. Also a notable example is in Pokémon where you have mankey who evolves into primeape and loses their tail in the process. Of course this also kind of implies that apes are just angrier, stronger monkeys.

            Also completely unrelated to our conversation, but relevant to your username…Metriod is my absolute favorite gaming series, Metriod Prime is amazing, and I always wanted to be Samus when I grew up.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Super Metroid is my jam, but I like the Prime series as well. Hopefully 4 will release someday!

                • samus12345@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I was disappointed by Dread. Far too much focus on twitch reflexes compared to any other Metroid game. At least it wasn’t Other M, though!

    • clearleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      The dream used to be one device that does everything but I’ve backed away from that mentality hard. I even have two separate PCs now with nothing syncing between them.

      • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Only because the dreams of digital security and privacy (and functionality) died first. If I could be confident doing work and personal stuff on the same devices, I would.

    • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Digital watches are sweet and have very specific advantages in certain contexts. Douglas Adams just doesn’t get the G Shock hype!

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    9 months ago

    “ We promise it’s not just jewelry for men, promise, because men don’t wear jewelry. This is just a tool, and maybe a status symbol, but definitely not in the way jewelry can be a status symbol.”

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I like to wear a watch, it’s shiny and has gold. Definitely jewelry but also I like to be able to check the time without my phone. I don’t think people are going for Timex as a status symbol though. They’re cheap watches.

    • SomeAmateur
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Wrist watches used to be women’s wear. Pocket watches were for men until WW1 when they found out that wrist mounted timepieces are super handy when you need to carry a rifle all the time and launch attacks synchronized with walking artillery barrages.

      Just like anything else it can be purely for looks or purely for function but the best stuff does both at once. A nice looking precise watch, a pen that looks and writes great, dress shoes comfortable enough to wear all day, an Italian suit with a tactical liner lol

      • moonburster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think I’d go for a pocket smartwatch since they have no need for a lot of sensors and room for a bigger battery. And yes, I do know that if you will take something out of your pocket anyway, why not just your phone? For that I have no answer, I still want one

        • warl0x@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          First half: Heh, ironic because a phone is just a bigger smart watch, especially with an always on oled.

          Second half: What would that even look like!?

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is a replica prop from an old TV show about time travel. (Voyagers, the device was called Omni). That’s what I thought of.

    • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why not air allow yourself something that you like to look at and will look at often? Especially if it means looking at your phone less.

      Plus even someone (smart) with an AP can respect a cool $60 watch, doesn’t have to be a status symbol or for others at all. (And in fact the first thing people realize when they start watch collecting is that 99% of people aren’t looking at them.)

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      9 months ago

      Dearest birthing parent of mine, this timepiece responds not to my attempts at manipulation

      • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        To whom it may concern (the progenitor of my very existence):

        The clockwork temporal measurement device strapped 'pon the writhing fleshy tentacle protruding from mine own thorax remains sullen and unchanging despite my best efforts at provocation.

        Please advise.

        • drolex@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          O dear original source of half of my genetic material, including the differentiating heterotypical chromosome!

          Despite my many attempts at interacting through my somatosensory system with what looked like a haptic receptor of a timekeeping mechanism attached to my sinestro-anterior limb, the visual indicator of the aforementioned radiocarpal joint-mounted machine keeping track of the flow of hours, minutes and seconds (important: please note only the latter is a SI unit) remains devoid of any hint of a reactive process consequential to my stimulus.

          What the fuck.

          • breakcore@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            Brought forth, my mind, my spirit, conscience and flesh and all
            Into this universe, by merit of affections made by thee
            As forebearer, Zeus as to Hephaestus, as you to me
            Echoing ancestral age's call
            
            From infant times, whenst could I not procure my own
            Through learning and advancing in my worth
            You held me high, and pushed me forth
            By song affirmative in words and tone
            
            This trust of merits, my esteem, oft besong by you
            Make these words, this moment, this request
            Become the heaviest of my behest
            Albeit an inquire I can not undo
            
            Upon my arm, as equator round our very earth
            Is bound with leather strap, and nimble lock
            A dream of time, of days, of tick and tock
            Of life, it's passage, to the grave from birth
            
            A timepiece, chroniker, a metronome, a watch
            In and of itself a wondrous thing
            And as I watch it circumnavigate it's ring
            I have but a single question, single catch
            
            When on it's surface, with extended digits laid
            With tap, with stroke, with haste, with patience and between
            Expected outcome of my action, none are seen
            And of my merits, now am I afraid
            
            I humbly ask of you, my genesis, my kin
            Am I the one who know not how to utilize
            This measurer of time, this timeless prize
            Am I unknown to functions laid within
            
            No prodding, poking, touch or stroke
            Have rendered changes visually
            And therefore I conclude I now can see
            The functions I can not provoke
            
            I utter loudly "what the fuck"
            Have you equipped it with parental lock?
            
    • Moghul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would honestly enjoy a watch like that if it didn’t have 6768342 pieces of text on it. I’d rather have to read the manual and have a less cluttered looking watch. For now, I’ll stick to my automatic Seiko.

      • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        They make minimalist and ana-digi wave ceptors that are pretty sweet. Plus a classic square g shock model will have very little clutter, even less on a Timex Ironman if you like that look.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have a watch. I like it. Something about hands in a circle for estimating time is easier.

    I have a phone too, but it’s in my pocket.

  • FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can you not simply turn that off on most smart watches? Actual question, I haven’t owned one in a while

  • EinatYahav@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Didn’t they solve this issue with classical wrist watches with an LED that blinks if your phone has a notification?