I currently use a few browsers on various platforms:

  • Mullvad on Linux and macOS
  • Firefox (w. Arkenfox User.js) on FreeBSD
  • Safari (w. extensions & privacy settings changed) on iOS

However, I am finding the absence of any sort of cookie persistence in Mullvad and Safari to be a little annoying, as just about everything I use has 2FA enabled.

So, I was wondering what you would say a good choice for a second browser would be. I would use this to access a small number of privacy-respecting sites (such as CloudTube and Lemmy), which would involve saving cookies and allowing third-party content (i.e. googlevideo in CloudTube). Ideally, this should be Firefox or WebKit-based, and I would like suggestions for Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and iOS.

On macOS, I have not signed in with an Apple ID, so I can’t use the App Store; but I do have Homebrew and pkgsrc(7) installed.

Any ideas?

EDIT: I am NOT moving away from Mullvad. I’m looking for a COMPLEMENTARY browser which I can use for stuff like CloudTube.

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      81·
      10 months ago

      Ungoogled chromium need to be hardened since its goal is to be a drop-in replacement of chromium without google.

  • sugar_in_your_tea
    6·
    10 months ago

    Firefox on Linux, macOS, and FreeBSD should do it. Use container tabs to keep accounts separate. It’s what I use, and it works well.

    If I need a Chromium-based browser because a site is broken, I use Brave as a backup because they have ad blocking that actually works. I don’t remember the last time I launched it though.

    I don’t know about iOS. Everything on iOS is Safari under the hood, though if you’re in the EU, that could be changing soon. I don’t know enough to recommend any of them though.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    4·
    10 months ago

    I use Safari as my super-protected browser on MacOS and iOS, and if I have problems on a site I switch to Firefox with fewer privacy extensions. It’s a pretty good system, but I am going to look up your Arkenfox thing, as I haven’t heard of that before.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      4·
      10 months ago

      Long story short, it’s a set of scripts that make Firefox better, at the potential expense of breaking some websites.

      LibreWolf comes with some of Arkenfox functionality with less pain in implementation.

  • Scolding0513
    31·
    10 months ago

    your need sounds perfect for just using ungoogled chromium out of the box. make sure you turn off the switch for deleting data on exit, and you’re good to go.

  • EinatYahav@lemmy.today
    2·
    10 months ago

    I’m confused. Are you deleting everything nonstop on Safari? Because 2fa should be persistent on default.

    As for a mullvad alternative, maybe librewolf.

    • Delusion6903@discuss.onlineEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      I’m using Librewolf. The problem is that when cookies are deleted some sites will want to text you to “authenticate” your browser again. Your name and password alone are not enough.

      It gets old doing this repeatedly. And it pisses me off that they act like they are being so secure by doing this yet they use a text instead of an authenticator app.

        • Delusion6903@discuss.onlineEnglish
          2·
          10 months ago

          It just might. But my problem might still be that I have my entire history and cookies are deleted as they age past 28 days so anything that I only rarely return to is lost. I might have to check into exceptions.

  • Delusion6903@discuss.onlineEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    I use Librewolf on my laptop for most browsing, but I keep Google Chrome open just for Gmail, calendar, and drive. I know what you mean about losing the damn cookies making you suddenly have to get a text to authenticate again and that sucks.

    When I come across those sites I usually just pull them up in Chrome instead since I keep it open anyway. They are typically not tracking sites anyway and I’m using an adblocking DNS.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pubEnglish
    410·
    10 months ago

    I’m skeptical of any supposed privacy advocate that refuses to recommend Brave. It’s no Tor Browser but in my own experience and tests, it consistently wins over just about everything else outside of Tor Browser.

    Anyways, it recently added a forgetful browsing feature. What I do is have that toggled on by default, turning it off on individual sites that I want to keep logged in. Ultimately, this is better for privacy AND security, since it’d limit the damage of a token stealer.

    Another option might be Librewolf if you absolutely can’t handle a Chromium-based browser (I also take issue with that approach but that’s a different topic for a different day). Firefox but more private than default. Waterfox is also an okay option nowadays, since they’re now independent from the hostile takeover that they dealt with for a while.

    Overall, for my own setup, I use Brave for ~70% of my browsing, with the remaining 30% split between hardened Firefox (with BetterFox) at 20%, Librewolf at 8% and Mullvad at 2%. I only use Tor Browser once in a blue moon for sensitive subjects that could financially impact me, like medical sites, insurance research and so forth.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      2·
      10 months ago

      > tests

      Are you talking about the man paid by Brave who chose the tests that say Brave is best? 🤔

      • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pubEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        No, I’m talking about running it through test sites. No other browser outside of the Tor Browser is able to pass fingerprinting tests as consistently as Brave, in my experience.

    • Delusion6903@discuss.onlineEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Covermytracks makes never Brave look better than, say Librewolf, because Brave randomizes fingerprinting info while other browsers try to thwart fingerprinting by all looking the same.