• Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t a lot of issues come back to learned helplessness? I’m in a good place right now, and I do what I can, but I also feel so disenfranchised in the US political system that it all feels completely pointless.

      • natecheese@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think it’s a combination of learned helplessness and an unrealistic expectation of your ability to affect change.

        As of July 1st, 2023, there are 334,914,895 million people participating in the US political system, I think it would be a little ridiculous if every one of them could influence our government. Not all the people can vote, but they’re still participating in the political system whether they know it or not.

        Each of these people have their own ideas, hopes, dreams, ideologies. It takes a long time to sway that much public opinion, even when you aren’t fighting disinformation campaigns from powerful corporations and state actors. Keep at it and have realistic expectations about the impact you’ll have and how quickly things will change.

        Do what you can, live the best life you can, and don’t take responsibility for things that aren’t your fault.

        Edit: corrected the population of the United States because people oddly focused on that part of my comment.

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          As a non-American, I’m a bit confused. How are there 380 million people in the American political system? That’s an entire Spain more than the population of the US

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I dunno. In my lifetime there have been real movement on gay rights, and then real backsliding on women’s rights. Things can change. The bigger roadblock feels like the difference between advocating for social changes that might incidentally have economic impacts vs. advocating for policy changes that directly harm the economics of wealthy people.

      • ex_06@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You don’t have to change your system, you must change your surroundings :)

        If the system will come along, better. If not, you still kinda improved the life for those around you

    • kapulsa@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes!

      I always recommend checking out the following organizations, which are active in many nations:

      https://a22network.org/ the a22 network is a overarching network of many national climate movements using civil disobedience.

      https://fridaysforfuture.org/ Fridays for future was created after Greta Thunbergs peaceful protests and now has many national networks using mostly peaceful demonstrations.

      https://scientistrebellion.org/ scientist rebellion is a worldwide network of scientists using civil disobedience. Again there are many national groups within.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s weird how this is being approached as if it’s just a mental health problem. Decades into the future Gen Z’s mental health is going to be the least of their concerns. It’s like saying someone who is starving is suffering from anxiety that may have significant long-term consequences. Yeah, their mental health probably isn’t great and it’s going to get worse, but that’s not their primary long-term difficulty.

    • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Its just crisis stalling, first you ignore the problem, then you distract from the cause of the problem, then you try to mitigate the effects of the problem, but of course we don’t try to solve the problem cause that would cost rich people money.

      Imagine a miserable fish in a gross aquarium, a capitalist would try to feed the fish happy pills instead of cleaning the environment that makes the fish miserable.

  • Over9000transHP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Climate not just changing, it’s gone mad. But I don’t believe in official reasons of it. Looks to simple and stupid as many other “official” answers of scientists. It seems like Earth’s magnetic field just got weaker. And I see many proofs of this.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      How would a weakening magnetic field influence temperature.

      It doesn’t deflect electromagnetic radiation.