• horsey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    You can protest all you want outside. Someone would get kicked out of a school board meeting for this. Free speech means the government can’t arrest you for the content of what you say or restrict political assembly.

    • MarcoPOLOOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      10 months ago

      Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom […] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      • oxjox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

        It is legal to peaceably petition the government for a redress of grievances.
        It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional buildings.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yet another moronic comment from you. Having the right to petition the government does not mean you can disrupt official proceedings and refuse to leave when ordered to by the police. It’s the content of speech that’s protected, you can’t go to jail for saying Biden sucks…you can go to jail for disrupting official proceedings and trespassing. You’re pretending the right to free speech gives one the right to conduct that speech however they want, and that is again…an incredibly stupid thing to suggest.

        • oxjox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How bizarre is it that people simply choose to misinterpret plain English?

          One law says you can peacefully petition, the other says you can not be disruptive and obstructive.

          This should not be something anyone finds arguable.

      • horsey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Good job, but our rights don’t include standing up and screaming during official proceedings. It’s more that the government can’t arrest him for writing an op-ed or Twitter feed criticizing Biden.

        • MarcoPOLOOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think you understand what the first amendment actually claims

          • horsey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It does not guarantee the right to disrupt official proceedings, sorry. Like I said, go try that in a court. Walk in and start protesting about a political issue and claim you’re allowed to under the 1st amendment. This isn’t exactly the first time someone has tried that btw.