He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    112·
    9 months ago

    How is it better? You’ve done X either way.

    Also they’re making money from their subscribers and likely creating a lot more awareness. Which is better for the “universe”

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      94·
      9 months ago

      Ignore them. When people talk about “morals” and “the universe” they are signalling that they can’t be convinced otherwise.

      There’s no point in trying to convince someone who doesn’t want to change their mind. They may not even believe what they’re saying. Just a desire to believe is enough to harden someone’s mind against outside ideas.

      Everyone has things they want to be true. This person probably wants to be “moral” and in touch with “the universe”. So you can’t convince them that profit isn’t bad. They have decided that profit is never moral, so by arguing with that you argue that their deepest beliefs are false. You can’t win.