- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
This theory is pretty neat being part of the very few groups looking at the notion of spacetime as continuous and quantized matter as a secondary effect (as they self-describe, a “postquantum” approach).
This makes perfect sense from a simulation perspective of a higher fidelity world being modeled with conversion to discrete units at low fidelity.
I particularly like that their solution addressed the normal distribution aspect of dark matter/energy:
Here, the full normal distribution reflected in Eq. (13) may provide some insight into the distribution of what is currently taken to be dark matter.
I raised this point years ago in /r/Physics where it was basically dismissed as being ‘numerology’
But proponents of a radical new theory of gravity, in which space-time is “wobbly”, say their approach could render the elusive substance obsolete.
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it’s more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly, timey-wimey stuff.
Source:
I mean, a doctor said it, so…
Stumbled across this neat profile for the guy behind this research: https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-physicist-who-bets-that-gravity-cant-be-quantized-20230710/