• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m sorry but… I’m particularly offended by you pointing out numbers here. 50 years? Fuck you. Just… fuck you.

    • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      TNG aired in 1987, so it’s only 37 years. Whomever it was that wrote that headline stretched a bit to generate some extra clicks. Yeah, TAS ended in 1974, but there’s still 13 years in between where there was no Star Trek, which is apparently getting lumped into the Star-Trek-that-Riker-has-shown-up-in bundle.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, that’s technically correct then. The last time there was a Trek Show without Frakes was 1974 (50 years ago)

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Phrased differently, “it has been 50 years since a Star Trek show ended without a Jonathan Frakes appearance.”

        • Snoopey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The last year there was a star trek show without frakes was the year before tng was released…

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Technically the were no trek shows between TOS and TNG, so technically the last trek show without Frakes would be when TOS ended.

            It’s technically correct as long as reruns don’t count, and you exclude movies, etc… Hence “show”.

            It’s all riding a line of being technically correct.