0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agorulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1701arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1700arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.ml0x2d@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 months agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up65·edit-29 months agoThis will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history book
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up19·9 months agoI mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
minus-squareLinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·9 months agoThe original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since. 1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
This will make for interesting primary source material in a 2075 history book
I mean, seems like a textbook example of satire.
The original comic was created to illustrated the absurdity of misusing1 the word “literally.” Then, conservatives captioned it and shared it unironically as an anti-LGBTQ+ meme. Then, a third group understandably found the conservatives’ version laughable, and it’s been mostly shared ironically ever since.
1I don’t necessarily agree with the post. It’s okay to use “literally” just for emphasis, in my opinion.
They should have put the /s