Prized morels are unpredictably and puzzlingly deadly, outbreak report shows.

On Thursday, Montana health officials published an outbreak analysis of poisonings linked to the honeycombed fungi in March and April of last year. The outbreak sickened 51 people who ate at the same restaurant, sending four to the emergency department. Three were hospitalized and two died. Though the health officials didn’t name the restaurant in their report, state and local health departments at the time identified it as Dave’s Sushi in Bozeman. The report is published in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

  • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
    151·
    8 months ago

    “Morels are more likely to cause intestinal distress if eaten raw, although even raw, they can be tolerated by some people,” the agency wrote. Morels should be cooked before eating, as cooking can destroy bacterial contaminants. “For that matter, all mushrooms, wild or cultivated, should be cooked to release their full nutritional value because chitin in their cell walls otherwise inhibits digestion,” the USDA writes.

    The article mentions multiple times that cooked mushrooms are safer than raw ones.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      221·
      8 months ago

      Safer because “bacterial contaminants” and “full nutritional value”. These things may be technically true but they mislead by the larger omission that the real issue is their established toxicity.

      • Glowstick@lemmy.world
        2·
        8 months ago

        I wish food irradiation became popular. If only people weren’t so irrationally afraid of any word that sounds like the word “radiation”, then we would be able to safely eat all kinds of foods fully raw without any chance of getting sick from a microorganism.

        • Luccajan
          1·
          8 months ago

          I thought food irradiation went out of favour because the microbes became resistant? I have no idea where I heard that so maybe it’s just people’s irrational fear of “radiation”.

      • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
        2·
        8 months ago

        The article also points out that there were people who ate the raw sushi with no adverse affects, so mentioning “their established toxicity” seems like it would be just as misleading.