• Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    This feels more like an anti-atheist meme, since it implies that we might find evidence of God in the future even if we don’t have it now. Also implies that visual proof is the only kind of evidence which just isn’t the case.

      • Sentient
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is not what op was talking about and this do feel anti-atheist

          • Sentient
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            In the way that the proof may come out at any minute like the rest of them.

              • Sentient
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                What do you think we are talking about ? god of course.

                  • Sentient
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Bruh we were talking about this meme and this meme is what a theist argument will look like, that the proof could be discovered any day .

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      I am an atheist and would be fine if we found evidence of literally any kinda god. I am making a determination based on what I have to work with, if I have more to work with I will make a new determination.

      You do have to admit, from the theist pov, it is a bit disturbing that everything you can say about God is pretty much what you could say a 100 years ago. Everything we have learned hasn’t added to that body of knowledge. Why is that?

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        You do have to admit, from the theist pov, it is a bit disturbing that everything you can say about God is pretty much what you could say a 100 years ago. Everything we have learned hasn’t added to that body of knowledge. Why is that?

        And take that logic one step further. How much has been discovered and learned in the last century that was previously attributable to God by theists because we didn’t understand it? Doesnt the shrinking list of cosmic unknowns imply a diminish role for a god in our “organized” existence?

        • Rev. Layle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Colloquially known as “the god of the gaps”. If you put your faith in god’s power based on the unknowable, then god’s power continually decreases as the unknowable becomes known.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, there’s Brahma orbiting Pluto right in this picture, what other evidence do you need?