• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In the absence of service from companies like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Charter, counties and small towns in rural America could build broadband networks for their residents themselves, which can make the difference between prosperity and poverty.

    A historic provision in the 2021 infrastructure act upholds this tenet of digital democracy: $65bn under the broadband equity, access and deployment – or Bead – program to connect rural America to the world.

    Clyburn, wide awake with an opportunity before him, asked Bailey to donate 100 tickets to a tournament for local kids and a couple hundred laptops he could give to students in rural Clarendon county, near Orangeburg.

    Sanford Bishop, who represents rural south Georgia, told him about football players taking the team bus to McDonald’s after practice because they could get wifi in the parking lot, Clyburn said.

    Barriers in South Carolina resemble those in at least 16 other states today, which, in the name of a “level playing field” – a term coopted by the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec) in draft language – keeps government entities from competing with private carriers, even in rural broadband deserts.

    South Carolina hired Stritzinger away from running Revolution D, a rural broadband consultancy with a legacy of using real-world data to puncture questionable coverage maps promoted by internet carriers.


    The original article contains 2,197 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 90%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought this was just a bad attempt at cutting down the content, but the original article is just as abrupt and stilted.

      • jo3jo3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I skip these summaries entirely. Are they ever any good? I just slipped over them and assume it’s bullshit Ai I don’t care to read. I’ll just read the article if I really care.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          I find them useful for skimming articles, but when it’s “saved 90%” like this they tend to be somewhat disjointed.