Yet.

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Agreed!!!

    The user selects the content that they interact with, but because content that upsets you is so engaging, the AI will heartily promote it.

    look at how engaged you are with these comments! Is it because they make you upset?

    How interesting. ;-)

    • Strangle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I only really ever comment when I have something to say. This usually is only when I disagree with something.

      That’s why my upvote ratio is terrible. I rarely comment when I agree with something someone has said. I bet my ratio would be a lot better if I did.

      But that’s just human nature, I think. Some people crave acceptance and validation so they comment agreement and some people crave conflict and challenge, so they comment in disagreement.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone is the hero of their own story, so I think they feel the need to “correct” perceived injustices.

        I think your experience is common.

        And I think AI exploits this, because it’s useful.

    • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re attributing combative interaction to an algorithm on a site that has no algorithm. Congratulations you just proved the algorithm isnt needed to cause interaction. People do this with no computer forcing them to, but tons of people here are convinced that every other site is filled with bots manipulating content for people when the people are asking for the content, sometimes very directly.

      • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m attributing combative interactions to “keeping your attention”

        The ai just exploits this.

        So while it’s not NEEDED, it does happen and it works.

        Maybe your point is better worded as “the AI doesn’t overrule your own ability to choose”

        Which while true, doesn’t change my point. Combative interactions happen without ai, the ai just learns and promotes them.