My best (stupid) guess is weapons. US gov has a ton of weapons. Already sells tons of weapons. Now the prices will always remain stable. Other countries would love to know that 30 million usd would always be able to buy an f15. Other countries declaring war will increase the value of the USD, as buying weapons from us government will decrease amount of money in circulation.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The big problem for me was something Ben Bernanke said: the process of taking gold out of a hole in the ground (a mine) just to put it into a different hole in the ground (a vault) is a pretty terrible waste of resources. And you need to continue mining it in order to stave off deflation, which means you have to keep doing that forever; and eventually that’s just not going to work anymore. Mining gold is only going to become more expensive as time goes on.

    Not to mention, our economy is too big and moves too quickly for gold to be a moderating force to inflation anymore. The numbers are just too big and moving too fast; we need a more nimble lever, and right now interest rates are a pretty good one.

    All of that to say, there’s a reason every country has come off of the gold standard since the mid- to late-20th century.

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      All of that to say, there’s a reason every country has come off of the gold standard since the mid- to late-20th century.

      Because controlled inflation is necessary for an economy to function and nothing but a fiat currency has the desired characteristics.

      Gold is still the best option if you insist on having the currency backed.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure taking gold out of a hole to put it in a different hole is a waste of resources but there’s kind of a driving force towards that because if the currency is actually useful then people aren’t going to use it as currency and if it’s easy to produce they’re going to counterfeit it

      Same with cryptocurrencies, they’re hard to produce and functionless, so a huge waste of resources, and frankly same with (high frequency) trading of stocks, as you don’t own them when the dividends are paid yet you put huge resources into them because other people want them because of their inherent value

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        But doing something just for the sake of finances…it doesn’t add anything to the world. The original question was “what do you pick?” and I don’t like the idea of picking an energy-intensive activity that doesn’t help the world in any way.