Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to AntiTrumpAlliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTrump urges US Supreme Court to endorse 'absolute immunity' for ex-presidentswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down10 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up191arrow-down1external-linkTrump urges US Supreme Court to endorse 'absolute immunity' for ex-presidentswww.reuters.comLanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social to AntiTrumpAlliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60·1 year agoStill can’t quite figure out why Trump wants Biden to have the right to assassinate him.
minus-squareNounsAndWords@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·1 year agoYes, yes, but he’ll already be immune to assassination attempts. What part of Absolute Immunity doesn’t make sense? (Besides all of it)
minus-squaresteal_your_face@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe only way to settle a dispute between two presidents is to have an immune-off. They are exposed to an array diseases and the one who survives has the greatest immunity.
minus-squarelemmylommy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoHe knows Biden won’t use it.
Still can’t quite figure out why Trump wants Biden to have the right to assassinate him.
Yes, yes, but he’ll already be immune to assassination attempts. What part of Absolute Immunity doesn’t make sense? (Besides all of it)
LOL nice take!
The only way to settle a dispute between two presidents is to have an immune-off. They are exposed to an array diseases and the one who survives has the greatest immunity.
He knows Biden won’t use it.
deleted by creator