“Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre will introduce a non-confidence motion Wednesday designed to topple the government and trigger a federal election — a parliamentary manoeuvre that’s likely to fail.”

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not really, though. His main purpose is to keep both the carbon tax and his own name in the headlines, so I guess he succeeded.

    • sbv
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      It will also let him say his party voted to axe the tax, while the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc either vote for it, or abstain. It’s a purity test the other MPs are designed to fail.

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “We’ll get rid of this tax!”

    “Won’t that mean less money in the pockets of the majority, making things worse for them?”

    “😡”

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not if they cut funding to things like healthcare, infrastructure, science, education, etc. and give more money to corporations who donate to their political party.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        We’re talking about the carbon tax, what’s collected in your province (except for BC and Quebec) is redistributed directly to the people in the province based on their household situation (with or without spouse, with or without child…), it doesn’t affect the government’s coffers and a small minority gets less than they pay.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess I went to school longer than most conservatives!

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Step 1: Add a tax

            Step 2: Redistribute the money collected directly to the people based on their situation

            Step 3: Watch conservatives get mad even though the vast majority of people get more than it cost them

              • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Alberta just banned solar and wind farms because they are ‘ugly’ then opened a new coal mine. They deserve some more taxes.

              • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 months ago

                No money is moving from Saskatchewan to Newfoundland via this carbon pricing model.

                Who suggested to you that it was? I’m worried someone is lying to you to sway your opinion.

                The money collected by the carbon pricing program stays in that province and is redistributed to the citizens of that province.

      • Untitled4774
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Would you like to expand on your views or just stick to pointless ad hominems?