• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The skies are already polluted with Starlink satellites and there’s even more coming. I agree that is does solve some situations, but it’s being done for profit, not for undeveloped areas. Sticking more shit in our skies for money is really sad, I am surprised there’s not more international regulations for this kind of satellite spam.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      8 months ago

      but it’s being done for profit, not for undeveloped areas.

      This is such a Lemmy comment, there’s nothing evil about providing a service for a price.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not on its own. Polluting the skies for profit is the problem. Why the cherry picking though?

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Of course cell towers are an eye sore. Though they are more necessary than starlink, often hidden by landscape or on top of buildings anyway. It’s not the “gotcha” comparison you think it is.

              • warm@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Perhaps necessary was the wrong word, though I don’t know if starlink supports the same bands the towers already do for 2G, 3G, 4G etc. They don’t obstruct our skies, so that’s much preferable.

                • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Starlink sats are only visible to the naked eye when they’ve just launched, once in orbit they’re only a problem for ground based optical astronomy, and even then it doesn’t seem to be as much of a problem as everyone makes out.

                  I get that you probably hate Musk, but a lot of the points you’re making are just nonsense.

                  • warm@kbin.earth
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Ahhh so it is about Musk and you are a fan. I wont engage anymore, have a good one.