Trae@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoHave you ever been to a movie so terrible that you saw people leaving the theater? Which one was it?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square572fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down110
arrow-up1393arrow-down1imageHave you ever been to a movie so terrible that you saw people leaving the theater? Which one was it?lemmy.worldTrae@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square572fedilink
minus-squareTrae@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down1·10 months agoThey came out in 2001, 2002, and 2003 which was a cinematic triumph at the time because he secured funding and filming rights to film all three movies at the same time.
minus-squareinvisiblegorillalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down10·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareCybertoothTiger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-210 months agoEveryone has preferences, but you’ve done yourself a disservice not going back and finishing. OP’s right calling them a cinematic triumph.
minus-squarelivus@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months ago@invisiblegorilla they filmed all three at the same time, they had multiple second unit directors. That’s why the actors don’t age between movies, there’s a seamless progression.
They came out in 2001, 2002, and 2003 which was a cinematic triumph at the time because he secured funding and filming rights to film all three movies at the same time.
deleted by creator
Everyone has preferences, but you’ve done yourself a disservice not going back and finishing. OP’s right calling them a cinematic triumph.
@invisiblegorilla they filmed all three at the same time, they had multiple second unit directors.
That’s why the actors don’t age between movies, there’s a seamless progression.