This question is obviously intended for those that live in places where tap water is “safe to drink.”

I live in Southern California, where I’m at the end of a long chain of cities. Occasionally, the tap smells of sulfur, hardness changes, or it tastes… odd. I’m curious about the perspective of people that are directly involved and their reasoning.

  • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t buy bottled water. I buy gallon jugs that I then refill at a filling station. Where I’m at, the filling station is typically about 0.40 USD/gallon.

    Still, I get your point. It would, of course, still be cheaper by far to use tap water.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Personally, I would trust those filling stations a whole lot less than my tap water. Tap water is constantly purified and being tested, and strictly regulated my multiple agencies, and the press is ready to jump on it the second it’s unsafe.

      One of those filling stations? Well for one the water I’m 90% sure is the same tap water anyway, and for 2, do they produce reports every month showing how safe they are like our city water does?

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Tap water is constantly purified

        But unlike a lot of the filling station water, tap water is often not purified with UV or reverse osmosis. (I looked it up and mine isn’t anyway.) So some dangerous byproducts from mining and the like get through.

        and the press is ready to jump on it the second it’s unsafe.

        Honestly, this is an excellent point I hadn’t thought of.

        One of those filling stations? Well for one the water I’m 90% sure is the same tap water anyway …

        It is, I believe, but with UV & reverse-osmosis so it’s more strongly filtered than tap water in the end.

        … and for 2, do they produce reports every month showing how safe they are like our city water does?

        Fair point.

         

        (Also, please be aware that I fully admit I am not knowledgeable on this stuff; I’m just trying my best. So, if I am spouting any misconceptions, I welcome correction as long as it is kindly done.)

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like UV and reverse osmosis are better, but if your city is already purifying it’s probably overkill. From my very quick research it sounds like it’s a good option only if your local tapwater is currently failing, which honestly some american towns and cities are. In that case - go for it, but if you’re city is passing, then it sounds like you’re purifying already perfectly safe to drink water.

          https://www.forbes.com/home-improvement/home/reverse-osmosis-water-pros-cons/

          • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I guess what I’m concerned about is if the current purification methods used by my city is not good enough. By that I mean they do all the stuff they should be doing, but by not doing reverse osmosis or UV they let some things through that can hurt you.

            I’m worried that by doing everything BUT those latter two, the city could be putting me and people I care about at risk.

            Are you saying this is an unreasonable worry? Am I understanding you correctly?