• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because we have rights and if mini-lockdowns dont work, I dont think crazy lockdowns would be justified. Why should I a healthy person not be able to do anything because other people might get sick? Why dont they stay in their house and let the other 90% of the population keep working?

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Half-measures are often far less than half-as-effective. Mini-lockdown didn’t work because it wasn’t a real quarantine, isolation was not achieved. Did you know the word quarantine comes from Latin meaning forty days? Because that’s how long ships were kept out of Venice in the late 1300s to make sure nobody on board had the plague. That’s the kind of harsh policy required for success, but the world decided that the immediate economy is worth more than permanent eradication of dangerous pathogens.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        So then you agree with me that the lockdowns didnt work? That is really all I am trying to say here, the issue is that people still believe the lockdowns actually worked, and all of the evidence shows literally the exact opposite.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          They failed at the lofty goal of eradication. They, along with vaccination programs, succeeded in reducing the rate and intensity of infections.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            The goal was never eradication it was to “flatten the curve”. As you said it didnt work, and that is the thing that people are in denial about.