• FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    I acknowledge the US has been the “imperial core”. The thing I take issue with is the finger pointing.

    As if the United States is unique in seeking out and pursuing its interests. China and Russia may not be the “imperial core” but, all nations will do what’s in their best interest.

    That’s the flaw with nations, the campist lens of “America bad, Russia and China good” isn’t productive. Das all I’m saying.

    • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No other country controls the global financial system like the US, and imperial core countries in general, does through its dollar hegemony and global monopolies.

      Which is natural, since the entire modern world, its institutions and trade systems, are built on the past few centuries of brutal colonization of the rest of the world by western europe and japan.

      finger pointing

      Acknowledging reality isn’t “finger pointing”.

        • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          But they don’t, so talking about those "what if"s are pointless. China’s current interests — and, broadly speaking, those of capitalist Russia even after the USSR has been overthrown — are mostly in line with the Global South’s against imperial core countries. There’s a reason sentiment like this is common across the developing world.

          Many of western countries’ victims, like Cuba, DPRK, Burkina Faso, Palestine, etc., would not be able to function right now, or perhaps even exist, if they did not have China and Russia’s support. Of course, alot of them like Libya aren’t able to function anymore.