• Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    See, that’s my exact point. You can’t keep track of even two things.

    By your logic, she is simultaneously:

    1. Not well paid enough to speak on the issue, (because Sandra Bullock?)

    2. Paid too much to be able to speak on the issue (because she needs a second yacht?)

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Well, no, because you already said she needs to make more than Sandra Bullock, who makes more than her, but she already makes too much.

        It’s like asking me to pick a number that is both larger than 10 and smaller than 5. There is no such number.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            JFC now you’re saying she thinks women can’t earn more than her? “I think I’d earn more as a man” and “I think women can’t out earn me” aren’t even close to the same statement.

            I swear to god it’s just a steady stream of you just making shit up. It’s obvious why nobody can keep up with you: you’re existing in a fantasy where you’re fabricating a reality completely unteathered from the one the rest of us are existing in. I genuinely envy the freedom you have to reason from a context unconstrained from the annoyances of trying to reconcile your position with objective reality.