• Solivine@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    How do you go about enforcing this when the company goes under? (Almost like healthcare shouldn’t be private lol)

    • Patches
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 months ago

      Open Source required when going bankrupt for all biomedical companies?

      • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t help if no one picks up the ball on manufacturing spare parts. Manufacturing medical devices is really expensive, even more so when you have to do small batches of niche hardware, and requires fairly special manufacturing capabilities so it’s not easily done by anyone.

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes. The licensing approval for things like this need to include a plan for continued support if/when the company goes belly up. That would have to include the govt agreeing to pick up the slack, which would require some kind of trust fund for each individual implant to cover a lifetime of maintenance. Or, you know, nationalisation. But this is the world we live in … so even the most basic solution won’t happen because it might get in the way of some rich fuckers turning people into money.