- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/64887
cross-posted from: https://pixelfed.crimedad.work/p/crimedad/677711492673009332
A practice shot of the moon.
I’m trying to get ready for the eclipse that’s coming up. Supposedly the exposure settings you need for a good shot of a full moon will work for a total eclipse.
My setup is a little bit janky: it’s a 400mm Sigma telephoto lens intended for a Minolta 35mm SLR mounted to a Nikon DSLR adapter mounted to a Nikon D3000 DSLR, which has a partial frame sensor.
I was making fun of samsung moon pic scandal hence the /s. Your work is really good.
I had to look it up and I completely missed that controversy. I realize I’m late to the game, but that’s absolutely insane that a camera app would essentially replace what it thinks is a bad photo by the user with an AI generated photo of what it thinks the user actually intended to produce. Such a process is dishonest, arguably unethical, and stupid! If the app thinks the user took a bad photo of the moon, it should just say so with a prompt including a link to a good, public domain photo.
And thank you! As far as I know, I did not have any help/interference by AI lol!