Around 6:30 p.m. on May 26, Brittany Shamily was at home with her children, including an infant, when police used a battering ram to bust in her front door. “What the hell is going on?” she screamed, terrified for herself and her family. “I got a three-month-old baby!”

While the family was detained outside, the SWAT team “ransacked” their house, the lawsuit says. One SWAT team member punched a basketball-sized hole in the drywall. Another broke through a drop ceiling. They turned over drawers and left what had been an orderly house in disarray.

After this had gone on for more than half an hour, the AirPods were located — on the street outside the family’s home.

It later came to light that one of Shamily and Briscoe’s daughters saw what was likely the stolen Charger careening through their neighborhood a little before 7 a.m. that day. (The vehicle later crashed on the 1700 block of Foley Drive, about six miles from the family’s home.) It stands to reason that someone in the Charger tossed a pair of stolen AirPods onto the street in the vicinity of the quiet house police later busted into and ransacked.

The family, represented by Schock and Erich Vieth, is suing for damages stemming from embarrassment, unreasonable use of force, loss of liberty, and other factors. The lawsuit notes that neither Shamily or Briscoe had been in any trouble with the law for at least a dozen years prior to the incident. “There was no probable cause for the search warrant and had the affidavit contained complete information, the state court judge would not have approved the warrant,” the suit allege

    • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      8 months ago

      Swat teams have no business being involved in a property crime case of any sort. Law and order my ass.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the trick, don’t present it as a property crime…

        “The SWAT team was looking for guns and other material related to a carjacking that had occurred that morning.”

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          The original premise made sense. It was a specialized response to extreme circumstances, where rando beat cops would’ve been outgunned, and letting them try would endanger more people. The obvious problem has been letting every asshole with a badge cosplay that scenario.

          Except when they actually encounter that scenario, like in Uvalde.

          • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            We existed for a long ass time without them, we would be fine if we returned to that. Anytime we give cops more power they use it on the people they most frequently victimize.

            Give the money that goes to cops to solve the underlying factors that create of crimes of poverty.

            • mindbleach
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              And no new problems ever happen. Right? No threats in the twentieth century were any different from the blunderbuss-and-bayonet era. Barney Fife was perfectly equipped to handle the Munich Olympics massacre.

              • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Every town having a SWAT team is a phenomenon that is younger than I am, and I’m not all that old.

                I’d posit that whatever SWATs supposed utility is vastly overwhelmed by their negative downsides. SWATing alone outweighs the benefits. That and cops propensity to want to use their shiny weapons whenever they can alone with the cop brain idea that all non cops are potential enemies seems like a shit system that we should be dismantling.

                • mindbleach
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes, hence, “the obvious problem has been letting every asshole with a badge cosplay that scenario.”

                  The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer. Anything can be abused. We still have problems, and the sane solutions will tend to involve things that can be abused, because anything can be abused.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      They won’t. Police have qualified immunity. At best taxpayers pony up, but even that is unlikely.

      • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is both true and awful - we, the tax payers, just paid an inept SWAT Team to cosplay doing what is essentially a military operation, to the cost of either one completely innocent family getting their house and lives fucked over or all of us paying a bunch of money to fix what they broke.

        What a fucking system. St. Louis is dangerous, but not so much that they need to fucking rush in a SWAT Team without good intel. I hope these bastards at least get their toys and privileges taken away… but bringing charges against anyone responsible - I have no hopes that will happen.