Hi all,

I made this typst template originally to port my personal resume to typst from Latex. It tries to be a faithful port of the Awesome-CV latex template that I was previously using. Hope you find it useful.

https://github.com/DeveloperPaul123/modern-cv

Edit: added missing link

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is interesting as I simply copied the same styling as the previous template I was using. Would it be better to highlight the entire first word instead of the first n letters?

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        All of those headings are single words.

        Taste is subjective, but mine says either color the whole heading or don’t color it at all.

      • Lowpast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Black only. Either bold or italics if you feel the need to add emphasis.

        Most resumes are parsed by tools and you’ll never see fancy formatting anyways.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve used the template this is based on before. I just set the default color to black and modified the word to be all bold.

      I appreciate that OP did a perfect port though.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You just don’t appreciate how prestigious it is to get a degree from Example U.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Uh, my dad had to donate a gazebo to example u so I could get in, and I was a legacy candidate!

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks for the feedback! I think this makes sense for those who do have work experience. Do you think this should still be the case for new graduates?

      Also I should note you can easily change the order of things in your own CV.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Idk if this common around the world but in Germany it’s because you sort from present to past.

      • stuckgum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes. Your education is a 5 second skim through, I would not put it at the center page. If you believe you have zero relevant experience, then omit that panel and let’s make the main focus your projects.

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This looks good.

    A few unsolicited nit-picky suggestions;

    • I’m not a big fan of mixing colors in a single word. ‘Taky’ might the be the right to describe why. I do like the color blue you used - if you’re going to do it, make it the whole word. The name should also be consitent. Bold and either black or blue, not black and blue.
    • The light blue and light gray body text is difficult to read. Colors should be solid black, or navy blue. Bright and ‘fun’ colors are heard to read for some. Assume they’re colorblind or will print it on a B&W printer with poor contrast.
    • I like to lead with the job title instead of the company. Where you worked is largely irrevelvant compared to what you’ve done at those places. It also makes it easy to combine company, city and years in one line.
    • start with previous jobs (unless education was most recent or more relevant to new job). Typically the order is job > skills > education.
    • Avoid italics they can be unnecessarily diffuclt to read

    Engine Mechanic

    Bob’s Auto | City, ST | 2017-2021


    Education does not need so many details (if relevant to job, include specific courses and projects). Grad date can be omitted to help obfuscate you’re age (a grad from 2024 is probably inexpirenced, while a 1967 grad is going to be retiring soon).

    Two lines is all you need;

    Bob’s University, City, ST

    B.S. Computer Science, minor electrical enginnering

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks for all the feedback! I’ll take each point into consideration as I work on the next version of the template :)

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m working on some of the changes your suggested. Here are screenshots of the adjustments. I’m curious to hear your thoughts. Thanks!

      Here is a monochrome version without colored headers. I also adjusted the default accent color, but this is user configurable as well.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It looks a lot cleaner now.

        The body text seems too light still, but that might be my phone screen. It should be solid black.

        Only One change from here I would strongly recommend making is the blue “city” text black.

        Treat blue and bold text as your ‘highlighter’, there to help someone quickly navigate to the important sections of the page. City is not important. Your use of varriying font sizes and bullet lists is great for page navigation.

        If I was going to use color, I’d highlight the jobs before the city name/git link.

        The rest is personal taste.

        Personally, I think the blue headers is enough. It might get to too blue if you color job titles as well. You don’t need a separate monochrome version, the dark blue will show as black if it happens to be printed in B&W. You should also test print your resume in B&W. I find easier to spot errors on paper.


        Edits as I spot more little things.

        (Also there’s an extra space in the second skill name - Event Bus)

        (You also have space to make programming languages one line. At first glace I though you had a blank section for “languages”. Could probably just say “programming”, but I’m not in that field so maybe that’s frowned upon?)

        (In education, you have an example line underneath the university name, what is that line for? I would put the degree in that space, not off to the side. That’s technicaly more important that the university it self, but it’s probably “improper form” to list that above the uni name. (or whatever some one snoby would say).

        (One last thing, you don’t really need your full street address. Its unlikely anyone will mail you a response, and its just as likely you’ll have to enter it into the application form anyways. City will suffice.)

        (One last last thing, if you’re going to give yourself titles at the top, you better show them in your expirence section. (I know this is just an example template and I am being incredibly picky) but I don’t see architect anyware in the actual resume. That communicates to me you’re just calling yourself related titles hoping one sticks)

  • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I was using a template like this several months ago, (in typst) I think someone had already ported awesomecv beforehand.

        • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ahh yes, I tend to forget about these “awesome” lists. Thanks for the links.

          It seems that Brilliant CV is a direct port of the same latex template I used to use as well. The developer references it as well in the README. I do think my template is a bit easier to use and is more up to date with the latest typst version but there are some really nice templates on there.

  • Azzk1kr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is great! How would you describe your experience creating this template? I’ve been wondering about porting the modern-cv template from LaTeX myself.

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Overall it was pretty nice honestly. Especially coming from Latex. Creating a template in Latex was very difficult but in typst it’s way more intuitive (at least to me) and it’s easy to control every aspect of the text and its layout.

  • tarius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Somewhat unrelated question:

    How do you list experience based on projects under single employer with timeline?

    Right now I have it like this:

    • Consultant

      Employer - 2020 - 2023

      • Developer - June 2023 to August 2023
        • Description 1
        • Description 2
      • Analyst - March 2021 - May 2022
        • Description 1

    I havent found any resume template that can handle this (nested experience) automatically

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I put this together in a few minutes using my template. Does this address what you meant?

      Here’s the typst code:

      #import "@preview/modern-cv:0.1.0": *
      
      #show: resume.with(
        author: (
            firstname: "Person", 
            lastname: "Lastname",
            email: "[email protected]", 
            phone: "111-111-1111",
            github: "DeveloperPaul123",
            linkedin: "LinkedIn Name",
            address: "111 Road Dr. City, Place 111111",
            positions: (
              "Software Engineer",
              "Software Architect"
            )
        ),
        date: datetime.today().display()
      )
      
      = Experience
      
      #resume-entry(
        title: "Company, Inc.",
        location: "Place, Earth",
        date: "2022 - 2023"
      )
      
      #secondary-justified-header(
        "Developer",
        "June 2023 to August 2023"
      )
      
      #resume-item[
        - #lorem(10)
        - #lorem(11)
      ]
      
      #secondary-justified-header(
        "Analyst",
        "March 2021 - May 2022"
      )
      
      #resume-item[
        - #lorem(10)
        - #lorem(11)
      ]
      
      • tarius@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This is very close. The only thing missing is job title for the parent along with the company name for each nested experience

        • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Whoops! I ommited that on purpose. But you can add the job title back in. And yes I see how that would be good for each sub section to have the company name.

          This should be doable, I’ll update this thread if I can implement it.

    • RDN@floss.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      @tarius @devpaul

      What you can do is more important that who you have done it for. I prefer to see skills, experience, employment history, and education in that order.

      • tarius@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I understand. But, consultants could work on so many various things based on the project. Its better to provide context of the role and what industry that project was instead of only showing one block of text.

        As an example, If I worked at a company for 2 years, I could have used GitHub for 3 months in one project and used GitLab for 6 months in another project. If I write both of them in the same block, you would think I have 2 years of experience in both which is not accurate.

        Obviously there are ways you can write that in the description. I was just wondering if there are options to have nested experience.

        • RDN@floss.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          @tarius
          The skills section is the place you can list years of use of each tool or technology. The experience section is a place to list accomplishments, independently of what tools were used.

          My recommendation is based on science consulting, where a pretty clear division can be made between tools and accomplishments.

          • tarius@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I dont use a Skills section at all in my resume. How do you determine the quality of skills based on just keywords in the skills section?

            In description if you show that you worked in certain technology for “this” long, you would get somewhat an idea of how skilled that person is in that tech

            Lets say I put Office in skills section, you wouldnt know how skilled I am in office. I might have only worked with it for a month. And I am talking about resume without any fancy graphics with bar graph to show the skill level

            • RDN@floss.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              @tarius
              The same question would apply to skills mentioned in the experience section–unless the experience section is nothing but a description of use of those skills. It seems as if you and I may be valuing the experience section in different ways.

              But the direct answer to your question is in an interview. If you assert both valuable skills and experience, then you will get pressed to demonstrate or explain those face-to-face.

              • tarius@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                The same question would apply to skills mentioned in the experience section–unless the experience section is nothing but a description of use of those skills.

                That’s why I said if the skill is listed as a description in the experience (not literally the keyword), the “time range” would give you somewhat of an idea about the person. Key here is not listing just the skill, but what they actually did with that skill.

                It seems as if you and I may be valuing the experience section in different ways.

                If you are a recruiter/manager that gives a call to everyone, then I appreciate what you do. But, wouldn’t your job be much easier if you are able to understand the candidate’s skill from the description without even talking to them? Filtering out inexperienced people would be much easier instead of just going by the skills section.

                But the direct answer to your question is in an interview. If you assert both valuable skills and experience, then you will get pressed to demonstrate or explain those face-to-face.

                In the current market for IT folks, its not easy to get an interview. So you wanna give as much information in the resume to get that first call. This is from my personal experience in the last 6-10 months

                • RDN@floss.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  @tarius

                  I’m interested in both the candidate’s skills and achievements. The list of skills is a quick and easy filter, but once past that, achievements deserve a lengthier explanation–and they may still reference skills.

                  Having hired for years in an IT-adjacent discipline, I like to see skills and achievements factored out, not unlike the way code or data structures should be factored.

                  A/B testing of resume structures might be interesting.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    That’s awesome, I spent a day fighting with Latex to edit awesomecv without causing errors or breaking the template. Really hope Typst takes off.

    I can only see the image though, not the link to your project

    • Disonantezko@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Someone already post that. Typst it’s already a lot easier to use, with meaningful errors and markup near markdown and don’t need 200x hard disk space, nor dependencies to work.

    • devpaul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thanks!

      I added the link now and yes, I really hope typst takes off as well. I’ve been using it pretty extensively where I can at work and my personal life and it’s so much easier than Latex. I haven’t done anything too complicated yet so we’ll see how it goes.

      Also I added the missing link 😅

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I am also in the single pager, latex CV club. I ended up splitting into two columns though like -

                     NAME
                contact deets
    -----------------------------------------
    bio                   |    current workplace
    skills                |    old workplace (senior)
    education             |    old workplace (midlevel)
    projects              |    first workplace
    
  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As a manager who sometimes hires, I can’t say that I would ever particularly care about the education section for the types of roles I hire for, let alone put it first and foremost.

    Also, personally, my own CV combines my role’s duties and its achievements/projects together for each of the jobs I’ve had, with a primary focus on the recent.

    • Benn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Education section first for very junior roles. Experience first for anyone with professional experience